Monday, October 5, 2026

Topic / Level 4; transport [13]; on water [iii] the ferryman’s boat

The little cumba, however, is elevated into a dark, supernatural vessel in Virgil’s Aeneid (Book 6, Lines 298–304) being used to refer to the boat of Charon that transported the dead. The excerpt shows a range of poetic devices.

[298] portitor hās horrendus aquās et flūmina servat

[299] terribilī squālōre Charōn, cui plūrima mentō 

[300] cānitiēs inculta iacet, stant lūmina flammā,   

[301] sordidus ex umerīs nōdō dēpendet amictus.   

[302] ipse ratem contō subigit vēlīsque ministrat    

[303] et ferrūgineā subvectat corpora cumbā,         

[304] iam senior, sed crūda deō viridisque senectūs.

[i]

amictus, -ūs [4/m]: cloak, mantle

cānitiēs, -ēī [5/f]: greyness, grey hair

contus, -ī [2/m]: pole, barge-pole; punt-pole

cumba, -ae [1/f]: skiff, small boat

mentum, -ī [2/n]: chin

portitor, -ōris [3/m]: ferryman; boatman

ratis, -is [3/f]: raft; (poetic) boat, ship, vessel

squālor, -ōris [3/m]: dirtiness, foulness, filth

[ii]

subigō, subigere, subēgī, subāctus [3]: push, force, propel from beneath

subvectō, -āre [1]: to carry across

[iii]

crūdus, -a, -um: raw, fresh, unripened

incultus, -a, -um: unkempt, uncultivated, wild

ferrūgineus, -a, -um: rust-colored, dusky, iron-grey

[298] portitor hās horrendus aquās et flūmina servat

  • a dreadful ferryman guards these waters and rivers

[299] terribilī squālōre Charōn, cui plūrima mentō / [300] cānitiēs inculta iacet, stant lūmina flammā

  • Charon, in terrifying filth, and on his chin lies a mass of unkempt grey hair, his eyes stare fixed in flame [literally: his eyes stand in flame]

[301] sordidus ex umerīs nōdō dēpendet amictus.   

  • a dirty cloak hangs down from his shoulders by a knot.

[302] ipse ratem contō subigit vēlīsque ministrat

  • He himself pushes the raft with a pole, tends to the sails,    

[303] et ferrūgineā subvectat corpora cumbā,

  • and carries bodies across in his rust-colored skiff    

[304] iam senior, sed crūda deō viridisque senectūs.

  • now rather old, but old age for a god is fresh and green.

Notes:

Metre: dactylic hexameter

Pōr-tĭ-tŭr | hās hōr-| rēn-dŭs ă- | quās ēt | flū-mĭ-nă | sēr-văt [- x]

Tēr-rĭ-bĭ- | lī squā- | lō-rĕ Chă- | rōn, cūi | plū-rĭ-mă | mēn-tō [- x]

  • The final syllable of the final foot may be short or long; this is known as an anceps:
  • /ui/ in cui is a diphthong and scanned as a single long syllable

[298] portitor hās horrendus aquās et flūmina servat / [299] terribilī squālōre Charōn, …

  • Virgil delays naming Charon until the subsquent line by first referring to his maritime role and his fearful appearance.

[A] portitor [B] hās [A] horrendus [B] aquās et flūmina servat

  • The terrifying guard and his dark environment are visually inseparable. Virgil achieves this by the use of hyperbaton, the separation of two grammatically connected words. Here, we specifically have two interlocking phrases A-B-A-B which, under the general heading of hyperbaton is known as synchysis.
  • Owing to the flexibility of Latin word order, hyperbaton is common in poetry and, in this excerpt, there are further examples discussed below.

[299] terribilī squālōre Charōn, cui plūrima mentō / [300] cānitiēs inculta iacet, stant lūmina flammā

  • squālor: dirtiness; foulness
  • plūrima … cānitiēs inculta iacet: grey hair is, of course, symbolic of old age, but the hair is neglected and sprawls over his chin i.e. this is not the image of a ‘respectable’ grey-haired old man, but of one who simply does not care.
  • Although the literal translation of plūrimus is very many, it can – as it does here – describe a singular noun (cānitiēs) and so is best rendered as a mass of grey hair
  • hyperbaton: plūrima mentō / cānitiēs inculta; the two adjectives ‘surround’ the noun phrase
  • lūmina: literally ‘lights’ (lūmen, -inis [3/n]) but here used poetically to refer to eyes
  • stant: Charon’s eyes are not flashing with fire as you might expect but ‘standing’ in a fixed stare

[301] sordidus ex umerīs nōdō dēpendet amictus

  • hyperbaton: the adjective sordidus sits at the beginning of the line, its matching noun amictus placed at the end. The grammatical structure physically wraps around the line, imitating the knotted, filthy cloak wrapped around the old god's body.

[302] ipse ratem contō subigit vēlīsque ministrat

  • ipse: the intensive pronoun creates a striking narrative contrast. Despite being old, filthy, and entirely neglected, Charon manages the operation of the Underworld ferry completely alone.
  • contō: contus, -ī [2/m]: long pole; here it refers to a type of barge pole or punt pole
  • subigit: subigō, -ere [3]: the verb has multiple meanings including ‘turn up from beneath’ e.g. when ploughing; it can also refer to kneading (dough) i.e. the pushing of the boat involves considerable physical effort.

[303] et ferrūgineā subvectat corpora cumbā

  • hyperbaton: here, the bodies of the dead are ‘enclosed’ within the boat.
  • Although the adjective ferrūgineus, -a, -um refers to the colour of rust, the image presented is not of orange or dark red but rather of a somber metallic grey heralding the murky underworld. The image below of an actual rusted hull suggests a ‘dead’ ship.

[304] iam senior, sed crūda deō viridisque senectūs.

  • The concept of old age (senior; senectūs) surrounds two adjectives that are associated with youth (crūda; viridis). This creates an oxymoron that refers to the juxtaposition of two opposing ideas e.g. ‘bitter sweet’. While Charon may physically appear old, he is immortal.

Gustave Doré; Dante 

Charon, illustration by Gustave Doré for an 1861 edition of Dante's Inferno (The Divine Comedy).

Saturday, October 3, 2026

Level 3+ (review); a Second Latin Reader (Vincent) [22]: Ariovistus declines battle

Caesar C. Procillum et M. Mettium mittit quī dē hīs rēbus cum Ariovistō agant; hīs imperat ut omnēs rēs cognoscant; sed Ariovistus cōnantēs dīcere prohibuit et in catēnās coniēcit.

Eōdem diē castrīs mōtīs Ariovistus sex mīlibus passuum ā Caesaris castrīs sub monte consēdit. Posteā praeter castra Caesaris suās cōpiās dūxit et castra fēcit, ut frūmentō commeātūque Caesarem interclūderet; illō tempore Sēquanī et Aeduī frūmentum Rōmānīs dabant.

Ex eō diē diēs continuōs quīnque Caesar prō castrīs suās cōpiās dūxit et aciem instruxit, ut contrā hostēs proeliō contenderet. Ariovistus autem hīs omnibus diēbus exercitum continuit, equestrī proeliō cotīdiē contendit.

Subjunctive usage

(1) purpose:

[a] ut + subjunctive

castra fēcit, ut frūmentō commeātūque Caesarem interclūderet

(he) established a camp, in order to cut Caesar off from grain and supplies [literally: in order that he might  / would cut Caesar off …]

aciem instruxit, ut contrā hostēs proeliō contenderet.

(he) drew up his battle line, in order to engage the enemy in battle [literally: in order that he might / would engage …]

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/02/050526-level-3-subjunctive-32-dependent.html

[b] quī + subjunctive; when the focus is on a person who is to perform the action

Caesar C. Procillum et M. Mettium mittit quī dē hīs rēbus cum Ariovistō agant

Caesar sends Gaius Procillus and Marcus Mettius to discuss these matters with Ariovistus [literally: who may discuss …]

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/02/180526-level-3-subjunctive-38-dependent.html

(2) indirect command

hīs imperat ut omnēs rēs cognoscant

he orders them to learn all the facts [literally: he commands that they should learn …]

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/02/190626-level-3-subjunctive-53-dependent.html

____________________

Caesar sends Gaius Procillus and Marcus Mettius to discuss these matters with Ariovistus; he orders them to learn all the facts; but Ariovistus forbade them to speak and threw them into chains.

On the same day, after breaking camp, Ariovistus took up a position under a mountain six miles from Caesar's camp. Afterwards he led his forces past Caesar's camp and established a camp, in order to cut Caesar off from grain and supplies; at that time the Sequani and the Aedui were supplying grain to the Romans.

From that day for five consecutive days Caesar led his forces out in front of the camp and drew up his battle line, in order to engage the enemy in battle. Ariovistus, however, kept his army within the camp throughout all these days and fought cavalry skirmishes every day.

Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Level 4; literature; Vulgate: The Parable of the Good Samaritan [Luke 10:25–37] (3); narrative structure; the rule of three; the tricolon

[25] Et ecce quīdam lēgisperītus surrēxit tentāns illum, et dīcēns: Magister, quid faciendō vītam aeternam possidēbō?

[26] At ille dīxit ad eum: In lēge quid scrīptum est? quōmodo legis?

[27] Ille respondēns dīxit: Dīligēs Dominum Deum tuum ex tōtō corde tuō, et ex tōtā animā tuā, et ex omnibus virtūtibus tuīs, et ex omnī mente tuā: et proximum tuum sīcut tēipsum.

[28] Dīxitque illī: Rēctē respondistī: hoc fac, et vīvēs.

[29] Ille autem volēns iūstificāre sēipsum, dīxit ad Iēsum: Et quis est meus proximus?

[30] Suscipiēns autem Iēsūs, dīxit: Homō quīdam dēscendēbat ab Ierusālem in Ierīchō, et incīdit in latrōnēs, quī etiam dēspoliāvērunt eum: et plāgīs impositīs abiērunt sēmivīvō relictō.

[31] Accidit autem ut sacerdōs quīdam dēscenderet eādem viā: et vīsō illō praeterīvit.

[32] Similiter et Lēvīta, cum esset secus locum, et vidēret eum, pertrānsiit.

[33] Samarītānus autem quīdam iter faciēns, vēnit secus eum: et vidēns eum, misericordiā mōtus est.

[34]  Et (1) appropiāns alligāvit vulnera eius, (2) īnfundēns oleum et vīnum: et (3) impōnēns illum in iūmentum suum, dūxit in stabulum, et cūram eius ēgit.

[35] Et alterā diē prōtulit duōs dēnāriōs, et dedit stabulāriō, et ait: Cūram illīus habē: et quodcumque superērogāverīs, ego cum redierō reddam tibi.

[36] Quis hōrum trium vidētur tibi proximus fuisse illī, quī incīdit in latrōnēs?

[37] At ille dīxit: Quī fēcit misericordiam in illum. Et ait illī Iēsūs: Vāde, et tū fac similiter.

[1] The purpose of a Parable is to convey a moral or spiritual concept in short and simple terms. It is also generalised, hence the use of:

quīdam lēgisperītus: a certain lawyer / expert in the law

homō quīdam: a certain man

sacerdōs quīdam: a certain priest

Samarītānus … quīdam: a certain Samaritan

i.e. the parable applies to everybody and is not narrowed by references to specific individuals or periods of time.

[2] Note the means by which statements can be succinctly expressed:

[i] present active participle, for example:

l25: tentāns illum, et dīcēns |  testing him, and saying

[ii] ablative absolute constructions comprising two words:

l30: plāgīs impositīs |  with blows having been inflicted

l30: sēmivīvō relictō | with him having been left half alive

l31: visō illō:  with him having been seen

Such literal translations – although the first step in comprehending meaning – need to be reworked depending upon context, for example:

l31: visō illō praeterīvit

There are various possibilities including:

[i] When he saw him, he passed by.

[ii] After / once he had seen him, he passed by.

[iii] Having seen him / (upon) seeing him, he passed by.

[3] An interesting feature is the structure of lines 31-33. It is neither being flippant, nor undermining the moral value of the lines to observe that, given that the parable is compressed storytelling, it parallels the structure of a three part joke.

Exposition (setting the scene and circumstances): Three men are stranded on a desert island and find a magic lantern. A genie pops out and grants each of them one single wish.

(1) Setup: The first man says, "I wish I was back home with my family." Flash! He vanishes.

(2) Reinforcement: The second man says, "I wish I was back home in my warm bed." Flash! He vanishes. This establishes the pattern with the same or similar language and recounting of events.

(3) Subversion (the ‘punchline’): The third man looks around at the empty beach and says, "Wow, I feel so lonely now. I wish my two friends were back here with me!"

Line 3 undermines the expectation established in lines 1 and 2.

Compare that structure with lines 30-33:

Line 30: exposition

Homō quīdam dēscendēbat ab Ierusālem in Ierīchō, et incīdit in latrōnēs, quī etiam dēspoliāvērunt eum: et plāgīs impositīs abiērunt sēmivīvō relictō. 

  • "A certain man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among robbers, who also stripped him: after they had beaten him, they departed, having abandoned him half alive.”

(1) Line 31: set up

Accidit autem ut sacerdōs quīdam dēscenderet eādem viā: et vīsō illō praeterīvit. 

  • “It happened that a certain priest was going down the same road, and when he saw him, he passed by.”

(2) Line 32: reinforcement

Similiter et Lēvīta, cum esset secus locum, et vidēret eum, pertrānsiit. 

  • “And similarly, a Levite, when he was beside the place and saw him, passed by.” 

(3) Line 33: subversion i.e. what is expected based upon the content of lines 31-32 is reversed:

Samarītānus autem quīdam iter faciēns, vēnit secus eum: et vidēns eum, misericordiā mōtus est. 

  • “But a certain Samaritan, while travelling, came beside him: and seeing him, was moved by pity.” 

While this parable is, of course, in no way light-hearted, it is –  like the account of the Trial of Jesus – a striking example of highly focused narrative technique, in which moral teaching is delivered in a form that is concise, memorable, and free of superfluous detail. Noticeable also is the implication of hypocrisy on the part of the priest and the Levite without this being specifically expressed.

[4] The “rule of three” is a common feature of, for example, our contemporary advertising and political slogans:

NIKE: (1) JUST (2) DO (3) IT

McDONALD’S: I’M LOVIN’ IT

PEACE! LAND! BREAD!

Ideas are conveyed in groups of three because our minds absorb that information quickly:

LOOK RIGHT, LOOK LEFT, LOOK RIGHT AGAIN

Such a structure is not new. In this triumphant line, we see it:

VENI, VIDI, VICI: three ‘messages’, poetically bound by three identical perfect tense forms and the alliteration of V.

[i] The parable divides the key events into three but with similar lexis that combines them.

[ii] Note also line 34:

(1) appropiāns alligāvit vulnera eius, (2) īnfundēns oleum et vīnum: (3) et impōnēns illum …

The term when dealing with Latin Literature is the tricolon. Below are links which discuss the tricolon and, in particular, Cicero’s frequent use of the device.

29.04.24: the tomb of Scipio Barbatus; I’m lovin’ it

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2024/05/290424-tomb-of-scipio-barbatus-im-lovin.html

29.05.24: level 2; a side note

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2024/05/290524-level-2-side-note.html

07.04.25: Level 3; deponent verbs (9); perfect, pluperfect and future perfect tenses

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/01/070425-level-3-deponent-verbs-9-perfect.html

30.01.26: Level 3; indirect statement; the accusative-infinitive [16]; the perfect passive infinitive [iv]; reading

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/11/300126-level-3-indirect-statement.html

24.04.26: Describing objects [17]; Cicero against Verres, ‘the art thief’

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/01/240426-describing-objects-17-cicero.html

07.06.26; Level 3+; Subjunctive [49] passive forms [ii] imperfect passive (3) anatomy of a sentence; Cicero’s rhetorical style

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/02/070626-level-3-subjunctive-49-passive.html

19.02.27: Level 3+ (review); correlatives [6] making comparisons (3); totiēns … quotiēns …

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/07/190227-level-3-review-correlatives-6.html

23.01.27: Level 3+ (review); correlatives [2]

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/07/230127-level-3-review-correlatives-2.html

15.04.27: Topic / Level 4; transport [6]: wheeled vehicles (6) raeda; Cicero and the defence of Milo [i]

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/09/150427-topic-level-4-transport-6.html

16.04.27: Topic / Level 4; transport [7]: wheeled vehicles (7) raeda; Cicero and the defence of Milo [ii]

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/09/160427-topic-level-4-transport-7.html

Topic / Level 4; transport [12]; on water [ii]

 [1] scapha, -ae [1/f]: skiff; light boat

(1) In translation, scapha may simply be rendered as ‘boat’ – but not ship, since the term does not convey a large vessel:

potuimus vix obtinēre scapham (Vulgate)

  • we were able, with difficulty, to secure the boat

(2) Comenius (1685) uses scapha to describe a way in which sailors might escape from a ship-wreck i.e. in the equivalent of a lifeboat (illustrated below):

Quīdam ēvādunt, vel tabulā (7), ac ēnatandō, vel scaphā (8)

  • Some escape, either on a plank, 7. and by swimming, or in the boat, 8.

This reflects the description given in Harper’s Dictionary of Classical Antiquities:

“A skiff or cutter carried on large vessels to be lowered for use as required” (Thurston Peck)

(3) Similarly, Caesar uses the term to refer to ‘skiffs’, small boats that are attached to larger vessels:

quod cum animadvertisset Caesar, scaphās longārum nāvium, item speculātōria nāvigia mīlitibus complērī iussit

  • When Caesar had noticed this, he ordered the skiffs of the long ships, and likewise the reconnaissance vessels, to be filled with soldiers.

nāvigium speculātōrium: reconnaissance vessel

(4) This line from Plautus clearly indicates the difference in size:

Illa autem virgō atque altera itidem ancillula dē nāvī timidae dēsuluērunt* in scapham

* = desiluerunt

  • The young girl, however, and another little maid likewise, both afraid, have leapt down from the ship into a little boat.

(5)

Intereā ex secundō commeātū quem ā Siciliā mīserat Aliēnus, nāvis ūna in quā fuerat Q. Cominius et L. Ticida equitēs Rōmānī, ab residuā classe cum errāvisset dēlātaque esset ventō ad Thapsōn, ā Vergiliō scaphīs nāviculīsque āctuāriīs excepta est et ad Scīpiōnem adducta. (Dē Bellō Āfricō)

  • Meanwhile, from the second supply convoy which Alienus had sent from Sicily, one ship—in which the Roman knights, Quintus Cominius and Lucius Ticida, had been, since they had strayed from the rest of the fleet and had been carried by the wind toward Thapsus, was intercepted by Vergilius with skiffs and fast light-vessels, and brought before Scipio.

classis, -is [3/f]: fleet

commeātus, -ūs [4/m]: (supply) convoy

[2] cymba, -ae [1/f] / cumba, -ae [1/f]: small boat; dinghy

< Anc. Gk. κύμβη [kúmbē]: [i] hollow of a vessel: drinking cup, bowl; [ii] (Phoenician) boat.

Abī tū: appellant hūc ad mōlem nostram nāviculam . . . Tum interibi locī cōnscendō cumbam piscātōriam, . . . veniō, iacitur anchora, inhibent lēniter. (Afranius)

  • Go on, you: they are bringing a small boat right here to our pier ... Then, meanwhile at that place, I board a fishing skiff ... I arrive; the anchor is cast; they gently row backwards."

mōlēs, -is [3/f]: (here) pier; jetty

[3] ratis, -is [3/f]: raft

hic subsecūtus quō modō trānsierit, utrum ratī an piscātōriō nāvigiō, nēmō sciēbat (Rufus)

  • How this man, having followed closely, crossed over – whether by raft or by a fishing boat – no one knew

[4] lembus, -ī [2/m]: small fast boat; cutter

Note that, in all three quotations below, general reference is made to ships, but lembus is identified as a specific type. Some translations may not specifically convey this. However, I have consistently used ‘cutter’ to distinguish it from other ships.

(1) The size of the lembus in comparison with other large warships which could have up to four banks of oars is shown by Livy’s reference to this vessel’s limited number of oars:

nāvēs quās cīvitātibus maritimīs adēmisset redderet nēve ipse nāvem ūllam praeter duōs lembōs, quī nōn plūs quam sēdecim rēmīs agerentur, habēret (Livy)

He was to return the ships which he had taken away from the maritime states, and he himself was not to have any ship except two cutters, which were to be propelled by not more than sixteen oars.

(2) C. Popilius, …, postquam dēbellātum in Macedoniā et statiōne summōtōs hostium lembōs audīvit, dīmissīs et ipse Attalī nāvibus … nāvigāre Aegyptum pergit, … (Livy)

Gaius Popilius, … after he heard that the war in Macedonia had been brought to an end and the cutters of the enemy had been removed from their station, and once the ships of Attalus had been dismissed he himself proceeded to sail toward Egypt, …

maritimus, -a, -um: maritime; pertaining to the sea

rēmus, -ī [2/m]: oar

(3) The noun can be associated with pirate ships, fast and able to inflict damage:

From Plautus:

Nicobulus: Periī hercle, lembus ille mihi laedit latus.

  • By Hercules, I’m ruined, that cutter is crashing into my side.          

Chrysalus: Is erat commūnis cum hospite et praedōnibus. …

  • It was jointly owned by your friend and pirates. …

Chrysalus: Is lembus nostrae nāvī īnsidiās dabat.

  • This cutter was lying in wait for our ship.

Level 3+ (review); a Second Latin Reader (Vincent) [21]: Caesar and Ariovistus

His responsīs datīs Caesar lēgātōs ad Ariovistum mittit: primum nē diūtius mīlitēs trans Rhēnum in Galliam trādūcat; deinde obsidēs omnēs reddat; nē bellum contrā Aeduōs gerat; nē oppida sociōrum oppugnet.

Quibus nuntiīs acceptīs Ariovistus sē imperāta Caesaris nōn factūrum esse respondit. Illō tempore lēgātī ab Aeduīs et Trēverīs ad Caesarem veniēbant. Quibus rēbus mōtus Caesar magnīs itineribus contrā Ariovistum contendit.

Language focus: subjunctive

Subjunctive usage: jussive subjunctive (2)

The jussive subjunctive, apart from meaning “let (somebody do something)” may also express what somebody should or should not do:

[1] jussive subjunctive; affirmative i.e. what somebody should do

obsidēs omnēs reddat | he should return all the hostages

[2] nē + present subjunctive; negative jussive i.e. what somebody should not do

nē diūtius mīlitēs trans Rhēnum in Galliam trādūcat

nē bellum contrā Aeduōs gerat | he should not wage war against the Aedui

nē oppida sociōrum oppugnet | he should not attack the towns of the allies

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/01/030426-level-3-subjunctive-11.html

____________________

After these replies had been given, Caesar sends envoys to Ariovistus: first, that he should not lead any more soldiers across the Rhine into Gaul; next, that he should return all the hostages; that he should not wage war against the Aedui; and that he should not attack the towns of the allies.

When these messages had been received, Ariovistus replied that he would not do the things ordered by Caesar. At that time envoys from the Aedui and the Treveri were coming to Caesar. Moved by these events, Caesar advanced against Ariovistus by forced marches.

Level 4; literature; Vulgate: The Parable of the Good Samaritan [Luke 10:25–37] (2) text; translation; notes

Luke 10:25–37

[25] Et ecce quīdam lēgisperītus surrēxit tentāns illum, et dīcēns: Magister, quid faciendō vītam aeternam possidēbō?

And behold: a certain expert in the law stood up, testing him (Jesus) and saying: “Teacher, what must I do to have eternal life? [literally: by doing what, shall I possess …?]”

faciendō: gerund

https://adckl.blogspot.com/search/label/gerund

[26] At ille dīxit ad eum: In lēge quid scrīptum est? quōmodo legis?

And he said to him: “What is written in the Law? How do you read it?”

[27] Ille respondēns dīxit: Dīligēs Dominum Deum tuum ex tōtō corde tuō, et ex tōtā animā tuā, et ex omnibus virtūtibus tuīs, et ex omnī mente tuā: et proximum tuum sīcut tēipsum.

Replying, he said: “You will love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul and with all your strength, and with all your mind: and your neighbour as yourself.”

[28] Dīxitque illī: Rēctē respondistī: hoc fac, et vīvēs.

And he said to him: “You have answered correctly: do this and you will live.”

[29] Ille autem volēns iūstificāre sēipsum, dīxit ad Iēsum: Et quis est meus proximus?

But wanting to justify himself, he said to Jesus: “And who is my neighbour?”

[30] Suscipiēns autem Iēsūs, dīxit: Homō quīdam dēscendēbat ab Ierusālem in Ierīchō, et incīdit in latrōnēs, quī etiam dēspoliāvērunt eum: et [i] plāgīs impositīs abiērunt [ii] sēmivīvō relictō.

But Jesus, replying [literally: taking up (the question)], said: "A certain man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among robbers, who also stripped him: [i] after they had beaten him, they departed [ii] having left / abandoned him half alive.”

Ierīchō [f.]; indeclinable

Ierūsalem / Hierūsalēm [n.]; indeclinable

Ablative absolute:

[i] plāgīs impositīs: with blows having been inflicted

[ii] sēmivīvō relictō: with him having been left half alive

____________________

[31] Accidit autem ut sacerdōs quīdam dēscenderet eādem viā: et vīsō illō praeterīvit.

“It happened that a certain priest was going down the same road, and when he saw him, he passed by.”

accidit ut + subjunctive: it happened that ….

The line could be rephrased as: A priest happened to be going down …

03.10.26: Level 3+ (review); impersonal verbs [8] introducing clauses with ut + subjunctive; cōnstat + accusative-infinitive

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2026/04/031026-level-3-review-impersonal-verbs_13.html

[32] Similiter et Lēvīta, cum esset secus locum, et vidēret eum, pertrānsiit.

“And similarly, a Levite, when he was beside the place and saw him, passed by.” 

secus (+ accusative): alongside, beside, along, by, near(by)

[33] Samarītānus autem quīdam iter faciēns, vēnit secus eum: et vidēns eum, misericordiā mōtus est.

“But a certain Samaritan, while travelling, came beside him: and seeing him, was moved by pity.” 

Lines 31-32: establish a pattern of behaviour, referring to two religious roles i.e. two individuals who, despite the Law referred to in l27, do not respond appropriately.

Line 33 sharply contrasts the behaviour of the priest and the Levite with that of the Samaritan, the latter assisting the man despite hostility between the Samaritans and the Jews.

However, all three lines are connected in the structure of the language.

(1) references to seeing the man but expressed in three different ways:

l31: visō illō [ablative absolute]

l32: cum … videret eum [imperfect subjunctive; cum-clause of circumstance]

l33: et vidēns eum [present active participle]

(2) references to disregarding the man; the same idea is expressed twice but in slightly different ways:

praeterīvit / pertrānsiit

Both are the perfect tense of prefixed forms of īre, one of which is contracted (pertrānsiit) and the other is not (praeterīvit).

Likewise, the aural similarity of praeter- and per- emphasises that neither the priest nor the Levite even stopped.

(3) the repetition of secus in lines 32 and 33 contrasts the responses: the Levite was alongside the man and passed by him, whereas the Samaritan was alongside the man and came to his aid.

____________________

[34]  Et appropiāns alligāvit vulnera eius, īnfundēns oleum et vīnum: et impōnēns illum in iūmentum suum, dūxit in stabulum, et cūram eius ēgit.

“And approaching (him) he bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine: and placing him on his own donkey, he led him to an inn, and took care of him.”

iūmentum, -ī [2/n]: (here) a draft animal i.e. one that is used for pulling carts or wagons e.g. a mule

[35] Et alterā diē prōtulit duōs dēnāriōs, et dedit stabulāriō, et ait: Cūram illīus habē: et quodcumque superērogāverīs, ego cum redierō reddam tibi.

“And on the next day he took out two denarii and gave (them) to the innkeeper, and said: ‘Look after him:  and whatever extra expense you may have [literally: whatever you may have spent more], I shall, when I return, give back.’”

quodcumque: whatever

02.12.25: Level 3; indefinites [14] -cumque [i]

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/09/021225-level-3-indefinites-14-cumque-i.html

[36] Quis hōrum trium vidētur tibi proximus fuisse illī, quī incīdit in latrōnēs?

“Which of these three seems to you to have been a neighbour to the one / man who fell into the hands of robbers?”

fuisse: perfect active infinitive

12.01.26: Level 3; indirect statement; the accusative-infinitive [9]; the perfect active infinitive [i]

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/11/120126-level-3-indirect-statement.html

[37] At ille dīxit: Quī fēcit misericordiam in illum. Et ait illī Iēsūs: Vāde, et tū fac similiter.

And he [i.e. the expert in the law] said, “The one who had mercy on him.” And Jesus said to him: “Go and do likewise.”

Thursday, September 24, 2026

Topic / Level 4; transport [11]; on water [i]

The topic of shipping was covered extensively in earlier posts:

https://adckl.blogspot.com/search/label/topic%3A%20ships

15.06.25: topic; ships [1]; Comenius LXXXVIII; ships; a Galley (1)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/150625-topic-ships-1-comenius-lxxxviii.html

15.06.25: topic; ships [2]; Comenius LXXXVIII; ships; a Galley (2)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/150625-topic-ships-2-comenius-lxxxviii.html

15.06.25: topic; ships [3]; Caesar on shipbuilding

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/150625-topic-ships-3-caesar-on.html

18.06.25: topic; ships [4]; Comenius XC; a Merchant ship (1)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/180625-topic-ships-4-comenius-xc.html

18.06.25: topic; ships [5]; Comenius XC; a Merchant ship (2)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/180625-topic-ships-5-comenius-xc.html

20.06.25: topic; ships [6]; Comenius; XCI; a Ship-wreck (1)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/200625-topic-ships-6-comenius-xci-ship.html

20.06.25: topic; ships [7]; Comenius; XCI; a Ship-wreck (2)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/200625-topic-ships-7-comenius-xci-ship.html

23.06.25: topic; ships [8]; Comenius; XCI; a Ship-wreck (3)

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/230625-topic-ships-8-comenius-xci-ship.html

23.06.25: topic; ships [9]; Comenius; XCI; a Ship-wreck (4); terra austrālis: the southern land

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/230625-topic-ships-9-comenius-xci-ship.html

26.06.25: topic; ships [10]; Comenius; CXLII; the Sea-Fight

https://adckl.blogspot.com/2025/03/260625-topic-ships-10-comenius-cxlii.html

[1] nāvigium, -ī [2/n]: vessel; ship; boat i.e. a general term for any form of transport on water whether it be a ship with sails or a boat that is rowed. Translations will vary dependent upon context. All of the following are from Cicero’s correspondence with Atticus:

Dē puerīs quid agam? parvōne nāvigiō committam?  

  • What shall I do about the boys? Shall I entrust them to a small boat?

Prōrsus dissolūtum offendī nāvigium vel potius dissipātum.

  • In fact I found a ship breaking up, or rather already in wreckage

Nāvigia colligēbat

  • He was collecting vessels

suntque nāvigia praetereā lūculenta

  • and, besides, there are some excellent ships

In the same way that English distinguishes size (but not function) of a vessel by referring simply either to ship or boat, so too does Latin differentiate:

[2] nāvis, -is [3/f]: the general term for a ship although, dependent upon context, it may translate as ‘boat’ if a smaller vessel is being described:

Nāvis, quae in flūmine magna est, in marī parvula est (Seneca the Younger)

  • A ship, which is big in a river, is tiny in a sea.

Latin will use adjectives to specify the functions of different types of large craft:

[3] nāvis onerāria: merchant / cargo ship

[4] nāvis longa: [lit: long ship] battle ship (especially with oars)

Here, Caesar refers to both types:

Nāvibus circiter LXXX onerāriīs coāctīs contractīsque, quot satis esse ad duās trānsportandās legiōnēs exīstimābat, quod praetereā nāvium longārum habēbat quaestōrī, lēgātīs praefectīsque distribuit.

  • After about eighty transport ships had been assembled and brought together, which he considered sufficient for conveying two legions across, he assigned whatever warships he had besides to the quaestor, the legates, and the prefects.

[5] nāvis āctuāria: fast transport ship

Note in this excerpt how the transport ships are adapted for the purpose of a naval battle:

nāvibus āctuāriīs quārum numerus erat satis magnus, magnitūdō nēquāquam satis iūsta ad proeliandum, rōstra imposuit. (Bellum Alexandrinum)

  • he fitted rams onto fast transport ships, of which there was a sufficiently large number, whose size was by no means adequate for fighting

rōstrum, -ī [2/n]: the protruding ‘beak’ at the prow of a Roman ship designed to inflict damage during a naval conflict

[6] nāvis piscātōria: fishing boat

deinde in piscātōriā quīdam nāve rētibus opertī circumvectīque ita ad castra Rōmāna conlocūtīque cum trānsfugīs

  • Then, covered with fishing nets in a fishing boat, certain men were carried around in this way to the Roman camp and conferred with the deserters;

[7] nāvicula, -ae [1/f]: small ship; little boat i.e. the diminutive form of nāvis indicated by the suffix -cula

adulēscentulus cum nāviculīs cuiusquemodī generis XXX, inibi paucīs rōstrātīs, profectus ab Uticā in Maurētāniam (Bellum Africum)

  • the young man set out from Utica to Mauretania with thirty small boats of every kind, including a few beaked ones among them.

rostrātus, -a, -um: fitted with a rōstrum (see [5] above)

Level 3+ (review); a Second Latin Reader (Vincent) [20]: The Gauls appeal for help against the Germans

Hōc bellō confectō multī principēs, quī ad Caesarem ex Galliae cīvitātibus convēnerant, ita sunt locūtī: ‘concilium tōtīus Galliae convocētur; dē salūte omnium cum Caesare agant.’

Quibus rēbus dictīs, ‘Ariovistus, rex Germānōrum,’ inquit Divitiacus, ‘omnēs ex Galliā expellere constituit: itaque Caesar Aeduīs subveniat atque exercitūs Rōmānōs contrā Ariovistum dūcat: omnēs Gallī cōpiās adiungant.’ Hāc ōrātiōne habitā omnēs quī aderant auxilium a Caesare petēbant.

Language focus: subjunctive

Subjunctive usage: jussive subjunctive (1)

All five subjunctives are independent jussive subjunctives, expressing proposals or recommendations made by the Gallic leaders. In English they are often translated with “let …”.

concilium tōtīus Galliae convocētur: let an assembly of all Gaul be called.

dē salūte omnium cum Caesare agant: let them discuss with Caesar the welfare of all

itaque Caesar Aeduīs subveniat: let Caesar help the Aedui.

exercitūs Rōmānōs contrā Ariovistum dūcat: let him lead the Roman armies against Ariovistus

omnēs Gallī cōpiās adiungant: let all the Gauls join their forces

https://adckl.blogspot.com/search/label/subjunctive%3A%20jussive

____________________

When this war had been brought to an end, many chiefs, who had come to Caesar from the states of Gaul, spoke as follows: “Let an assembly of the whole of Gaul be called; let them discuss with Caesar the welfare of all.”

After these things had been said, Divitiacus said, “Ariovistus, king of the Germans, has decided to drive everyone out of Gaul; therefore let Caesar help the Aedui and lead the Roman armies against Ariovistus; let all the Gauls join their forces.” When this speech had been delivered, all who were present sought help from Caesar.

Level 4; literature; Vulgate: The Parable of the Good Samaritan [Luke 10:25–37] (1) comprehension

[25] Et ecce quīdam lēgisperītus surrēxit tentāns illum, et dīcēns: Magister, quid faciendō vītam aeternam possidēbō?

[26] At ille dīxit ad eum: In lēge quid scrīptum est? quōmodo legis?

[27] Ille respondēns dīxit: Dīligēs Dominum Deum tuum ex tōtō corde tuō, et ex tōtā animā tuā, et ex omnibus virtūtibus tuīs, et ex omnī mente tuā: et proximum tuum sīcut tēipsum.

[28] Dīxitque illī: Rēctē respondistī: hoc fac, et vīvēs.

[29] Ille autem volēns iūstificāre sēipsum, dīxit ad Iēsum: Et quis est meus proximus?

[30] Suscipiēns autem Iēsūs, dīxit: Homō quīdam dēscendēbat ab Ierusālem in Ierīchō, et incīdit in latrōnēs, quī etiam dēspoliāvērunt eum: et plāgīs impositīs abiērunt sēmivīvō relictō.

[31] Accidit autem ut sacerdōs quīdam dēscenderet eādem viā: et vīsō illō praeterīvit.

[32] Similiter et Lēvīta, cum esset secus locum, et vidēret eum, pertrānsiit.

[33] Samarītānus autem quīdam iter faciēns, vēnit secus eum: et vidēns eum, misericordiā mōtus est.

[34]  Et appropiāns alligāvit vulnera eius, īnfundēns oleum et vīnum: et impōnēns illum in iūmentum suum, dūxit in stabulum, et cūram eius ēgit.

[35] Et alterā diē prōtulit duōs dēnāriōs, et dedit stabulāriō, et ait: Cūram illīus habē: et quodcumque superērogāverīs, ego cum redierō reddam tibi.

[36] Quis hōrum trium vidētur tibi proximus fuisse illī, quī incīdit in latrōnēs?

[37] At ille dīxit: Quī fēcit misericordiam in illum. Et ait illī Iēsūs: Vāde, et tū fac similiter.

(1) Note the line number(s) referring to:

being attacked by robbers _____

being moved by pity _____

being specifically told to do something _____ / _____

giving somebody money _____

giving the correct answer _____

Jesus being tested _____

obtaining eternal life _____

people who pass by _____ / _____

placing somebody on a donkey _____

what the Law actually states _____

(2)

[i] Who begins this conversation? (1)

[ii] How does Jesus respond to the first question asked? (1)

(3)

[i] Which line marks the beginning of the parable? (1)

[ii] What question prompts Jesus to begin the parable? (1)

(4) Which one word in the passage emphasises that the man was very seriously beaten up? (1)

(5) Line 36: Quis hōrum trium vidētur tibi proximus fuisse illī, quī incīdit in latrōnēs? To which three people is Jesus referring? (3)

(6) How are the man’s wounds treated? (3)

____________________

(1)

being attacked by robbers: [30] incīdit in latrōnēs

being moved by pity: [33] misericordiā mōtus est

being specifically told to do something: [28] hoc fac; [37]: fac similiter

giving somebody money: [35] prōtulit duōs dēnāriōs, et dedit stabulāriō

giving the correct answer: [28] Rēctē respondistī

Jesus being tested: [25] tentāns illum

obtaining eternal life: [25] quid faciendō vītam aeternam possidēbō

people who pass by: [31] sacerdōs … praeterīvit;  [32]: Lēvīta … pertrānsiit

placing somebody on a donkey: [34] impōnēns illum in iūmentum suum

what the Law actually states: [27] Dīligēs … tēipsum

(2)

[i] A lawyer / expert in the law | lēgisperītus

[ii] He asks him what is written in the law / how he interprets the law (any one). | In lēge quid scrīptum est? quōmodo legis?

(3)

[i] line 30: “Homō quīdam…”

[ii] line 29: And who is my neighbour? | Et quis est meus proximus?

(4) sēmivīvō: (literally) half alive (or can be rephrased in this context: half dead)

(5) a priest (sacerdōs); a Levite (Lēvīta); a Samaritan (Samaritānus)

(6) bandaged (1); oil and wine (1) poured on them (1) | alligāvit vulnera eius (1) īnfundēns (1) oleum et vīnum (1)


Topic / Level 4; transport [10]: heavy duty vehicles (3) carrus

[3] carrus, -ī [2/m]: wagon; vehicle for transportation of freight

As we continue to move through the topic of transport, you will see that a mere dictionary definition – although sufficient for translation purposes – does not always convey nuance of meaning, but it may be determined when reading in context.

Its function is clearly indicated in this first quotation from Caesar’s description of the Gauls’ preparations for a departure, iūmenta referring to the animals that would pull the wagons:

auctōritāte Orgetorigis permōtī cōnstituērunt ea quae ad proficīscendum pertinērent comparāre, iūmentōrum et carrōrum quam maximum numerum coemere (Caesar)

  • deeply moved by the authority of Orgetorix, they decided to prepare those things which pertained to setting out, [and] to buy up as great a number as possible of pack animals and wagons

The image of animals pulling cartloads of equipment generally conveys slow movement. However, in the following extract, the wagons are able to keep pace with troops that do not have heavy baggage:

magna enim multitūdō carrōrum etiam expedītōs sequī Gallōs cōnsuēvit (Aulus Hirtius)

  • For a large multitude of wagons was accustomed to follow the Gauls, even when they were lightly equipped.

Most noticeably, this description does not convey a slow advance but one so deafening that it terrifies the Roman horses:

essedīs carrīsque superstāns armātus hostis ingentī sonitū equōrum rotārumque advēnit et īnsolitōs eius tumultus Rōmānōrum conterruit equōs (Livy)

  • standing erect in chariots and wagons, armed enemies arrived with a mighty clattering of hoofs and wheels, frightening the horses of the Romans with the unfamiliar din.

In other words, unlike plaustrum and serrācum – both of which also refer to vehicles for freight transportation, but are not associated with any sense of ‘pace’ or speed – the carrus certainly appears to have had greater manoeuvrability. 

Friday, September 18, 2026

Topic / Level 4; transport [9]: heavy duty vehicles (2) serrācum

serrācum (sarrācum), -ī [2/n]: cart; wagon

Why should an entire post be devoted to a single word? Serrācum, like plaustrum, is most often defined as a cart or wagon. It would be perfectly legitimate to leave it at that since it occurs infrequently. However, in ‘exploring’ vocabulary – especially everyday objects about which the Romans said little – the noun serves as an example of being circumspect when you read very specific definitions for which there is a dearth of evidence.

[i] There is some debate as to whether this type of cart was fundamentally different from the plaustrum.

In Vitruvius’ discussions on machines and implements he distinguishes between the plaustrum and the serrācum but without specifying what that distinction is:

portātiōnēsque eōrum nōn essent, nisi plostrōrum [ = plaustrōrum] seu serracōrum per terram, nāviculārum per aquam inventae essent māchinātiōnēs.

  • ...and their transportation would not exist, unless the mechanisms of wagons or carts across land, and of small boats across water, had been invented.

[ii] It is suggested that its use was for transporting heavier payloads although we must be wary of assuming absolute distinctions when attested evidence is limited. Juvenal describes the traffic chaos caused by goods vehicles:

longa coruscat / serrācō veniente abiēs, atque altera pīnum / plaustra vehunt

  • A long fir-tree sways as the cart approaches, and other wagons carry a pine tree

His reference to a long / tall fir-tree suggests that a larger, sturdier vehicle would be required, its bulk emphasised by the swaying motion. However, the choice of nouns may simply be adhering to the poetic metre

sēr-rā- | cō vĕ-nĭ- | ēn-t'ă-bĭ- | ēs, āt- | qu'āl-tĕ-ră | pī-nūm

plāus-tră vĕ- | hūnt ...

Juvenal is less concerned with specific function than with the creation of an overall effect. Describing the dangers of such freight traffic with high, bulky and precarious payloads, he continues:

nūtant altē populōque minantur. | they totter on high and threaten the people

nam sī prōcubuit quī saxa Ligustica portat axis / et ēversum fūdit super agmina montem, | for if the axle which carries Ligurian stones [ = marble] has broken and poured an upturned mountain on the crowds

quid superest dē corporibus? | what remains of the bodies?

[iii] The description of the devastating Antonine Plague from 165 – 180 AD does imply that mass transportation of human bodies would require a flatbed vehicle on four wheels to maximise stability. After all, nobody would have wished plague victims to be strewn over the streets:

Tanta autem pestilentia fuit ut vehiculīs cadāvera sint exportāta sarrācīsque. (Historia Augusta)

  • ...and the plague was so great that bodies were carried out on carts and wagons

[iv] The following is a comment by Quintilian on a lost fragment of Cicero’s speech In Pisōnem:

An cum dīcit in Pīsōnem Cicerō 'cum tibi tōta cognātiō serrācō advehātur', incīdisse vidētur in sordidum nōmen, nōn eō contemptum hominis quem dēstrūctum volēbat auxisse?

  • Or when Cicero, in his speech against Piso, says 'when all your relations are carted in a serrācum', does he appear to have fallen back on a vulgar word, and not rather to have increased thereby his contempt for the man whom he wanted to ruin?

i.e. the noun is used pejoratively to convey social distinction; a vehicle that is normally used for the transportation of heavy goods is transporting people.

[v] The following two quotations refer to Boötes.  Derived from Ancient Greek Βοώτης [Voótis], “the herdsman”, it is a large constellation in the northern sky.

Referring to the stars, Ovid describes them as plaustra i.e. as a yoked ‘team’ of carts being driven by ‘the herdsman’:

Tē quōque turbātum memorant fūgisse, Boōtē, quamvīs tardus erās et tē tua plaustra tenēbant. (Ovid)

  • They say that you also fled in confusion, Boötes, even though you were slow and your wagons held you back.

Juvenal, however, portrays the stars in the same way as the slow, swaying wagon carrying a fir tree through crowded streets (see [ii] above). His use of serrāca is less elevated, emphasising the slow passage of time.

sīderibus dubiīs aut illō tempore quō sē / frīgida circumagunt pigrī serrāca Boōtae.

  • when the stars are fading or when the cold carts of sluggish Bootes wheel round.

To conclude, we can see that a single word can be:

  • open to multiple interpretations
  • used both literally and metaphorically
  • subject to overly confident and specific definitions